Annotation of negotiation processes in joint-action dialogues

نویسندگان

  • Thora Tenbrink
  • Kathleen M. Eberhard
  • Hui Shi
  • Sandra Kübler
  • Matthias Scheutz
چکیده

Situated dialogue corpora are invaluable resources for understanding the complex relationships among language, perception, and action. Accomplishing shared goals in the real world can often only be achieved via dynamic negotiation processes based on the interactants’ common ground. In this paper, we investigate ways of systematically capturing structural dialogue phenomena in situated goal-directed tasks through the use of annotation schemes. Specifically, we examine how dialogue structure is affected by participants updating their joint knowledge of task states by relying on various non-linguistic factors such as perceptions and actions. In contrast to entirely languagebased factors, these are typically not captured by conventional annotation schemes, although isolated relevant efforts exist. Following an overview of previous empirical evidence highlighting effects of multi-modal dialogue updates, we discuss a range of relevant dialogue corpora along with the annotation schemes that have been used to analyze them. Our brief review shows how gestures, action, intonation, perception and the like, to the extent that they are available to participants, can affect dialogue structure and directly contribute to the communicative success in situated tasks. Accordingly, current annotation schemes need to be extended to fully capture these critical additional aspects of non-linguistic dialogue phenomena, building on existing efforts as discussed in this paper.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Concern-Alignment for Negotiation and Joint Inquiry in Dialogues

‘Concern Alignment in Conversations’ project aims, through empirical examinations of real-life conversations, to establish a theoretical and descriptive framework to capture discourse structures and underlying rational and affective processes in human-human joint planning interactions at dialogue act exchange level. Concern alignment model has been developed to address convergent negotiation fo...

متن کامل

An Annotation Scheme for Cross-Cultural Argumentation and Persuasion Dialogues

We present a novel annotation scheme for cross-cultural argumentation and persuasion dialogues. This scheme is an adaptation of existing coding schemes on negotiation, following a review of literature on cross-cultural differences in negotiation styles. The scheme has been refined through application to coding both two-party and multi-party negotiation dialogues in three different domains, and ...

متن کامل

Classification of Modal Meaning in Negotiation Dialogues

This paper addresses modality classification for multi-issue bargaining dialogues in order to model human-like negotiation behaviour and to efficiently compute negotiation strategies. We propose a modality annotation and classification scheme comprising semantically distinguishable categories applied reliably by humans and machines. Our classification of modality varieties is based on both the ...

متن کامل

Extraction de préférences à partir de dialogues de négociation (Towards Preference Extraction From Negotiation Dialogues) [in French]

Towards Preference Extraction From Negotiation Dialogues This paper presents an NLP based approach for preference expression extraction from negotiation dialogues. We propose a new annotation schema for preferences and dependencies among them and illustrate on two different corpus genres. We then suggest a learning approach that efficiently extracts preference expressions using a combination of...

متن کامل

Preference Extraction From Negotiation Dialogues

This paper presents an NLP-based approach to extracting preferences from negotiation dialogues. We propose a new annotation scheme to study how preferences are linguistically expressed on two different corpus genres. We then automatically extract preferences in two steps: first, we extract the set of outcomes; then, we identify how these outcomes are ordered. We finally assess the reliability o...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • D&D

دوره 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013